Why would anyone be surprised?
http://www.universitybusiness.com/news/california-colleges-see-surge-efforts-unionize-adjunct-faculty
http://www.peterlang.com/index.cfm?event=cmp.ccc.seitenstruktur.detailseiten&seitentyp=produkt&pk=77271&cid=5&concordeid=312466
Tuesday, January 6, 2015
Size doesn't matter...
Yet another challenge for private universities:
Quinnipiac's tribulations over property taxes is a case study and a cautionary tale.
http://www.nhregister.com/general-news/20150104/quinnipiac-universitys-1-million-payment-to-hamden-in-question
http://www.peterlang.com/index.cfm?event=cmp.ccc.seitenstruktur.detailseiten&seitentyp=produkt&pk=77271&cid=5&concordeid=312466
http://www.nhregister.com/general-news/20150104/quinnipiac-universitys-1-million-payment-to-hamden-in-question
http://www.peterlang.com/index.cfm?event=cmp.ccc.seitenstruktur.detailseiten&seitentyp=produkt&pk=77271&cid=5&concordeid=312466
Drexel pulls back from presence on two PA community colleges.
The mouse that didn't roar?
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/01/06/promising-partnership-between-drexel-university-and-three-community-colleges-ends
Is retrenchment in the wind at private universities?
http://www.peterlang.com/index.cfm?event=cmp.ccc.seitenstruktur.detailseiten&seitentyp=produkt&pk=77271&cid=5&concordeid=312466
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/01/06/promising-partnership-between-drexel-university-and-three-community-colleges-ends
Is retrenchment in the wind at private universities?
http://www.peterlang.com/index.cfm?event=cmp.ccc.seitenstruktur.detailseiten&seitentyp=produkt&pk=77271&cid=5&concordeid=312466
Academics ponder the events in Ferguson and other locales.
Conference considers what these killings mean: "Not isolated incidents" is the conclusion.
http://chronicle.com/article/Ferguson-Did-Not-Happen-in/151047/?cid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en
http://www.peterlang.com/index.cfm?event=cmp.ccc.seitenstruktur.detailseiten&seitentyp=produkt&pk=77271&cid=5&concordeid=312466
http://chronicle.com/article/Ferguson-Did-Not-Happen-in/151047/?cid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en
http://www.peterlang.com/index.cfm?event=cmp.ccc.seitenstruktur.detailseiten&seitentyp=produkt&pk=77271&cid=5&concordeid=312466
Sunday, January 4, 2015
Sign up for my First Quarter 2015 Higher Ed Webinars here
http://jamescastagnera.wordpress.com/ned-mcadoo-2/
Here's what I have to offer:
Here's what I have to offer:
- Preventing and Managing Sexual Assault Cases - January 20
- Academic Dishonesty and Discipline - January 29
- Managing Your International Students - February 12
- Disabilities in the Classroom and Online - February 19
- Intellectual Property - March 5
- Student Handbooks - March 12
Friday, January 2, 2015
Ruminations about Free Speech in the Global Marketplace of ideas
Cliff May of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies rightly takes President Obama to task for making it sound as if it's up to corporations to "man-up" to North Korean threats and cyber-attacks. Isn't that in the president's job description, he asks with justification.
http://defenddemocracy.org/media-hit/may-clifford-d-the-war-on-free-speech/
His article goes on to talk about instances in which radical Islamists have cause universities, media and other entities to abandon their free speech rights. This is something I wrote about years ago:
http://psi.praeger.com/doc.aspx??x=x&d=%2fcommentary%2fCastegnara-20081028.xml&original_url=doc.aspx%3fx%3dx%26d%3d%252fcommentary%252fCastegnara-20081028.xml&ws=WS_PSI&as=doc.aspx&token=43507BB17FFEE35F32852A487B63D3D6&count=.!
Corporations for their part know how to fight for free speech when they want to. Witness the US Supreme Court's controversial Citizens United decision.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._Federal_Election_Commission
As for the controversy over "The Interview," my best guess is that Sony took the opportunity to ride the wave of media and social-net hype to a box office success for a film that otherwise was likely to yield mediocre results.
Then there's Hobby Lobby, which the Supremes permitted to use another section of the First Amendment to deny its female employees the contraceptive services otherwise mandated by Obamacare.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/01/us/hobby-lobby-case-supreme-court-contraception.html?_r=0
No, Mr. May, I would say that the big corporations are perfectly capable of taking care of their First Amendment rights when they want to. And the Supreme Court is right there to help them do it.
They are also entirely capable of abrogating those rights when profits are at issue. And that's why, Mr. May, you are right that it's up to Uncle Sam to protect those rights for all of us, especially when a foreign power --- Asian or Radical Islamic --- presents a threat to them.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






