Friday, February 27, 2015

A strange "intellectual property" tale:


francesco sisci

2:57 AM (4 hours ago)
to nonitalianiitaliani
The project of a harrowing movie on orphans adopted and sold on the internet thanks to a frightening legal loophole of the American system

see

http://www.theorphanclassifieds.com/
The Movie
Supporters
Contact
THE ORPHAN CLASSIFIEDS MOVIE
A film about America's underground online child exchange.


Follow
us on
Facebook!


Based on the true and horrifying stories behind America's online re-homing network.

Learn what you need to know about IP in my webinar next week:

Intellectual Property: A Key Asset Institutions of Higher Learning Can’t Afford to Squander

Best For: Higher Education
Date/Time: 3/05/2015, 1 PM Eastern
Duration: Scheduled for 90 minutes including question and answer session.
Presenter(s): James Ottavio Castagnera, Ph.D. and Attorney at Law
Price: $299.00 webinar, $349.00 CD, $399.00 webinar + CD. Each option may be viewed by an unlimited number of attendees in one room. CD includes full audio presentation, question and answer session and presentation slides.
Who Should Attend? Administrators, faculty, counsel

The 21st Century has heralded dramatic changes in higher education. In the words of Harvard Business School Professor Clayton Christensen, universities are “on the edge of the crevasse.” Author of The Innovative University, Dr. Christensen means that those institutions that fail to recognize and adapt to the challenges facing our aging industry will be in bankruptcy by the middle of the next decade.
The tweedy world of Mr. Chips in which colleges could afford to tolerate tenured faculty who taught a few days a week and devoted a few office hours to serving their students is a quaint, arcane memory. The tenured faculty represents the most significant investment of every college and university. And if this asset isn’t being used to maximum advantage, then it is a fiscal millstone dragging the institution down.
In addition to effectively deploying the faculty for teaching; research and grantsmanship are also essential. In areas of teaching and research intellectual property issues are paramount. With regard to delivery of instruction, the new technologies that led Dr. Christensen to make his provocative pronouncement require significant front-end investment and substantial ongoing support from the institution. Consequently, traditional, laissez faire customs concerning ownership of intellectual property are obsolete. The university has a vested interest in owning the IP of instructional delivery methods and content.
In the research realm, the artifacts of the creative process − scientific inventions, business and technology processes, and artistic productions − may be invaluable to the organization − provided the institution has a legally enforceable interest up front and a technology transfer function on the back end.
Please join Dr. James Ottavio Castagnera as he guides you through a discussion of the types of IP faculty members are producing and reviews legal and practical steps for your institution to take to protect its claims of ownership.

WHAT YOU’LL LEARN

Just a sampling of the many practical tips you’ll take away:
  • Review the basics of IP: patents, trademarks, trade secrets and copyrights
  • Discuss competing rights of tenured faculty and their institutions
  • Consider essential university policies
  • Understand contractual considerations and model provisions
  • Discuss vehicles of technology transfer
  • Review procedures for partnering with third parties for delivery of instruction
  • See how to go about protecting the institution’s brand: athletics and beyond
  • Review the place of government grants in the IP mix
  • AND MUCH MORE!

YOUR CONFERENCE LEADER

Your conference leader for “Intellectual Property: A Key Asset Institutions of Higher Learning Can’t Afford to Squander” is Dr. James Castegnera. Dr. Castegnera holds a law degree and a Ph.D. in American studies from Case Western Reserve University. Jim brings nearly three decades of experience in higher education to this webinar. Prior to law school he served Case Western Reserve as director of university communication. He went on to teach at the University of Texas-Austin, the Widener University Law School, and at the University of Pennsylvania, Wharton Business School. Currently, and for nearly the past 18 years, he has been Rider University’s associate provost and legal counsel. His diverse duties include risk management, regulatory matters, faculty and student disciplinary cases, litigation management, governance and institutional policies.
He is the author of 19 books, including the Handbook for Student Law for Higher Education Administrators (Peter Lang, 2010, revised edition 2014) and Al Qaeda Goes to College: Impact of the War on Terror on Higher Education (Praeger 2009).
His teaching experience includes continuing legal education courses, MOOCs on the Canvas Network − including “Risk Management in Higher Education: Student Issues” − and presentations at numerous national forums, including the Annual Conference of the National Center for the Study of Collective Bargaining in Higher Education and the Annual Homeland Defense and Security Higher Education Summit sponsored by the Naval Postgraduate School.

EducationAdminWebAdvisor.com QUALITY COMMITMENT

EducationAdminWebAdvisor, a division of DKG Media, LP, wants you to be satisfied with your webinar. If this webinar does not meet your expectations, email us atservice@educationadminwebadvisor.com.

CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION

Will CHina succeed in replacing the US as the sole superpower?

francesco sisci

3:06 AM (4 hours ago)
to nonitalianiitaliani
BOOK REVIEW
China's ambition
not quite a 'plan'

The Hundred-Year Marathon
by Michael Pillsbury
 (Feb 27, '15)
Will China succeed in overtaking the US as the top superpower by peaceful means? Michael Pillsbury, in his book subtitled "China's Secret Strategy to Replace America as the Global Superpower", warns that there is such a plan, but is it not, rather, a vague ambition such as is harbored by all states and people alike to one day become great? Still, Pillsbury might have the wrong answers, but perhaps he asks some of the right questions. - By Francesco Sisci 

it continues at

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/CHIN-01-270215.html


Should colleges call the cops?

This article asks why there are few drug arrests on private-college campuses.
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/02/27/how-institutions-handle-drug-violations-varies-greatly

I can tell you that at my institution the normal practice is to bring in the local PD.  But apparently not all private schools see it that way.
http://www.cengage.com/search/productOverview.do;jsessionid=85105782F0DB67AB7E142B0FB74A6303?N=16+4294922239+4294966221+61+4294949511&Ntk=P_EPI&Ntt=9344367867050971981083213667162986711&Ntx=mode%2Bmatchallpartial

Just when we thought it couldn't get any worse...

University administrators: Brace yourself for the College Accountability and Safety Act:
http://chronicle.com/items/biz/pdf/Campus%20Accountability%20and%20Safety%20Act%20-%20114th%20Congress.pdf
An outsider might be forgiven for thinking that college campuses are inner-city ghettos.
http://www.peterlang.com/index.cfm?event=cmp.ccc.seitenstruktur.detailseiten&seitentyp=produkt&pk=77271&cid=5&concordeid=312466

But can you take the rank out of college rankings?

Some new entrants in the ranking game focus on how grads make out after they enter the real world.
http://chronicle.com/article/The-Ever-Growing-World-of/190437/?cid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en
This makes the most sense to me.


Tuesday, February 24, 2015

My March Webinars:

Intellectual Property: A Key Asset Institutions of Higher Learning Can’t Afford to Squander

Best For: Higher Education
Date/Time: 3/05/2015, 1 PM Eastern
Duration: Scheduled for 90 minutes including question and answer session.
Presenter(s): James Ottavio Castagnera, Ph.D. and Attorney at Law
Price: $299.00 webinar, $349.00 CD, $399.00 webinar + CD. Each option may be viewed by an unlimited number of attendees in one room. CD includes full audio presentation, question and answer session and presentation slides.
Who Should Attend? Administrators, faculty, counsel

The 21st Century has heralded dramatic changes in higher education. In the words of Harvard Business School Professor Clayton Christensen, universities are “on the edge of the crevasse.” Author of The Innovative University, Dr. Christensen means that those institutions that fail to recognize and adapt to the challenges facing our aging industry will be in bankruptcy by the middle of the next decade.
The tweedy world of Mr. Chips in which colleges could afford to tolerate tenured faculty who taught a few days a week and devoted a few office hours to serving their students is a quaint, arcane memory. The tenured faculty represents the most significant investment of every college and university. And if this asset isn’t being used to maximum advantage, then it is a fiscal millstone dragging the institution down.
In addition to effectively deploying the faculty for teaching; research and grantsmanship are also essential. In areas of teaching and research intellectual property issues are paramount. With regard to delivery of instruction, the new technologies that led Dr. Christensen to make his provocative pronouncement require significant front-end investment and substantial ongoing support from the institution. Consequently, traditional, laissez faire customs concerning ownership of intellectual property are obsolete. The university has a vested interest in owning the IP of instructional delivery methods and content.
In the research realm, the artifacts of the creative process − scientific inventions, business and technology processes, and artistic productions − may be invaluable to the organization − provided the institution has a legally enforceable interest up front and a technology transfer function on the back end.
Please join Dr. James Ottavio Castagnera as he guides you through a discussion of the types of IP faculty members are producing and reviews legal and practical steps for your institution to take to protect its claims of ownership.

WHAT YOU’LL LEARN

Just a sampling of the many practical tips you’ll take away:
  • Review the basics of IP: patents, trademarks, trade secrets and copyrights
  • Discuss competing rights of tenured faculty and their institutions
  • Consider essential university policies
  • Understand contractual considerations and model provisions
  • Discuss vehicles of technology transfer
  • Review procedures for partnering with third parties for delivery of instruction
  • See how to go about protecting the institution’s brand: athletics and beyond
  • Review the place of government grants in the IP mix
  • AND MUCH MORE!

YOUR CONFERENCE LEADER

Your conference leader for “Intellectual Property: A Key Asset Institutions of Higher Learning Can’t Afford to Squander” is Dr. James Castegnera. Dr. Castegnera holds a law degree and a Ph.D. in American studies from Case Western Reserve University. Jim brings nearly three decades of experience in higher education to this webinar. Prior to law school he served Case Western Reserve as director of university communication. He went on to teach at the University of Texas-Austin, the Widener University Law School, and at the University of Pennsylvania, Wharton Business School. Currently, and for nearly the past 18 years, he has been Rider University’s associate provost and legal counsel. His diverse duties include risk management, regulatory matters, faculty and student disciplinary cases, litigation management, governance and institutional policies.
He is the author of 19 books, including the Handbook for Student Law for Higher Education Administrators (Peter Lang, 2010, revised edition 2014) and Al Qaeda Goes to College: Impact of the War on Terror on Higher Education (Praeger 2009).
His teaching experience includes continuing legal education courses, MOOCs on the Canvas Network − including “Risk Management in Higher Education: Student Issues” − and presentations at numerous national forums, including the Annual Conference of the National Center for the Study of Collective Bargaining in Higher Education and the Annual Homeland Defense and Security Higher Education Summit sponsored by the Naval Postgraduate School.

EducationAdminWebAdvisor.com QUALITY COMMITMENT

EducationAdminWebAdvisor, a division of DKG Media, LP, wants you to be satisfied with your webinar. If this webinar does not meet your expectations, email us atservice@educationadminwebadvisor.com.

CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION

********************************************

Student Handbook: A Crucial Higher Education Risk Management Tool

Best For: Higher Education
Date/Time: 3/12/2015, 1 PM Eastern
Duration: Scheduled for 90 minutes including question and answer session.
Presenter(s): James Ottavio Castagnera, Ph.D. and Attorney at Law
Price: $299.00 webinar, $349.00 CD, $399.00 webinar + CD. Each option may be viewed by an unlimited number of attendees in one room. CD includes full audio presentation, question and answer session and presentation slides.
Who Should Attend? Administrators, faculty, staff, higher education counsel


The 21st Century has heralded dramatic changes in higher education. Among them is the transformation of students and their parents into savvy consumers. They are buying a product − a diploma, a certification, a license to practice a profession − and they have many more options in the marketplace than ever before. The product you offer is expensive and your consumers demand that you deliver. Otherwise, at best they’ll go to another institution. At worst, they’ll sue you. Somewhere in the middle, your disciplinary actions may just be subject to challenge, but, even in this situation, without a well written and defensible student handbook in place your institution may find it difficult to defend its student disciplinary decisions.
This new business environment colleges and universities find themselves in demands that the institution’s handbook be a carefully crafted document, designed to deal with the multitude of unpredictable, but inevitable, issues that arise within a community comprised of bright but mostly young clientele.
The student handbook is a crucial piece of the contractual relationship between the institution and its students. As such, it can be a trap that ensnares the institution in a costly legal net. Or it can be a shield, protecting the school and its trustees, officers and employees from lawsuits, as well as publicity debacles. It all depends upon how thoughtfully and effectively the document is crafted − how well the institution’s faculty and staff are trained to use it − and how thoroughly it is integrated into the campus culture. Please join Dr. James Ottavio Castagnera for a review of both the risks and protections which student handbooks are intended to provide and a review of the policies which your student handbook should include.

WHAT YOU’LL LEARN

Just a sampling of the many practical tips you’ll take away:
  • Review student disciplinary rules and regulations
  • Understand the role of residence life in enforcing the rules
  • Know the role of security/public safety in enforcing policies
  • Discuss the student judicial process: from initial investigation of the charges to appeal of the discipline imposed
  • Discuss special, highly sensitive topics: harassment, bullying and sexual assault
  • Understand how academic standards and standing come into play
  • Discuss academic integrity and honor systems
  • Consider students’ roles in university governance
  • Find out how student organizations and activities come into play
  • Understand how financial obligations and financial aid issues may be affected
  • AND MUCH MORE!

YOUR CONFERENCE LEADER

Your conference leader for “Student Handbook: A Crucial Higher Education Risk Management Tool” is Dr. James Castegnera. Dr. Castegnera holds a law degree and a Ph.D. in American studies from Case Western Reserve University. Jim brings nearly three decades of experience in higher education to this webinar. Prior to law school he served Case Western Reserve as director of university communication. He went on to teach at the University of Texas-Austin, the Widener University Law School, and at the University of Pennsylvania, Wharton Business School. Currently, and for nearly the past 18 years, he has been Rider University’s associate provost and legal counsel. His diverse duties include risk management, regulatory matters, faculty and student disciplinary cases, litigation management, governance and institutional policies.
He is the author of 19 books, including the Handbook for Student Law for Higher Education Administrators (Peter Lang, 2010, revised edition 2014), which is available at Your text to link… and Al Qaeda Goes to College: Impact of the War on Terror on Higher Education (Praeger 2009).
His teaching experience includes continuing legal education courses, MOOCs on the Canvas Network − including “Risk Management in Higher Education: Student Issues” − and presentations at numerous national forums, including the Annual Conference of the National Center for the Study of Collective Bargaining in Higher Education and the Annual Homeland Defense and Security Higher Education Summit sponsored by the Naval Postgraduate School.

EducationAdminWebAdvisor.com QUALITY COMMITMENT

EducationAdminWebAdvisor, a division of DKG Media, LP, wants you to be satisfied with your webinar. If this webinar does not meet your expectations, email us atservice@educationadminwebadvisor.com.

CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION

Former students of the now-defunct Corinthian Colleges are conducting a debt strike

They are demanding relief, following the DOE's torpedoing of the company.
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/02/24/student-activists-call-%E2%80%98debt-strike%E2%80%99-against-federal-loans-they-incurred-embattled

http://www.cengage.com/search/productOverview.do;jsessionid=53F7E6BC7A50713559818AB7DC19F155?N=16+4294922239+4294966221+61+4294949511&Ntk=P_EPI&Ntt=9344367867050971981083213667162986711&Ntx=mode%2Bmatchallpartial

A state-by-state Breakdown of college graduation rates from the National Student Clearinghouse

http://chronicle.com/article/State-by-State-Breakdown-of/145379/?cid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en

http://www.peterlang.com/index.cfm?event=cmp.ccc.seitenstruktur.detailseiten&seitentyp=produkt&pk=77271&cid=5&concordeid=312466


Friday, February 20, 2015

A study shows that the people with the most clout in education are not the people with the greatest expertise.

http://chronicle.com/blogs/ticker/do-the-loudest-expert-voices-on-education-have-the-least-expertise/94441?cid=pm&utm_source=pm&utm_medium=en


Apparently wealthy donors want to have a big impact and be a big name on campus.

This report concludes that mega-gifts are on the rise but gifts over $1 million are getting to be fewer in number.
http://martsandlundy.com/reports-commentaries/ml-special-reports/2015/02/1m-gifts-to-higher-education-a-look-back-at-2014

http://www.cengage.com/search/productOverview.do;jsessionid=8764AD1F82C00E50BB9A099C5B4F0711?N=16+4294922239+4294966221+61+4294949511&Ntk=P_EPI&Ntt=9344367867050971981083213667162986711&Ntx=mode%2Bmatchallpartial

A sting operation involving a quid pro quo proposition

According to law enforcement authorities, this guy was advertising on Craig's List for students who would give sex in return for scholarships.
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/02/20/financial-aid-director-north-idaho-college-arrested-offering-scholarships-sex

After he lawyers up, he might want to subscribe to my "Termination of Employment" book and bulletin.  He will need it.

http://legalsolutions.thomsonreuters.com/law-products/Treatises/Termination-of-Employment/p/100000480

This writer contends that concealed handguns are ineffctive in combatting campus rape:

http://chronicle.com/article/Concealed-Handguns-Mainly-Miss/190233/?cid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en

http://www.amazon.com/Attorney-At-Large-Columns-Reviews/dp/1453831827/ref=sr_1_21?ie=UTF8&qid=1408803528&sr=8-21&keywords=castagnera

Jim Castagnera: What we learned from Kent State


What we learned from Kent State:


Legal liability for the Virginia Tech massacre: lessons of earlier mass shootings?

Part 1 in a series
The April 16th Virginia Tech massacre sent editors and writers scurrying to their microfiche and video vaults, and lawyers to case law.

Photo of Jim Castagnera
Jim Castagnera
The very day of the tragedy, CBS News recalled the mother of all campus mass-murders – the August 1, 1966, slaughter of 16 by a sniper from the top deck of the University of Texas Austin’s landmark tower.
But arguably America’s most notorious campus killing spree was the May 4, 1970 shooting of 13 students in about as many seconds on Kent State’s campus.  It has retained the public eye into the new millennium, thanks chiefly to a 2001 Emmy-winning documentary and Reporter-Novelist Philip Caputo’s 2005 book.
In the lingo of American tort (that is, personal injury) law, Virginia Tech more closely resembles the University of Texas. Both campuses were victimized by an unexpected and entirely unwanted intruder. If either institution, its officials and safety forces are legally liable, then the basis must be negligence – some common-law sin of omission. University executives should nonetheless familiarize themselves with the range of civil liabilities they may face in such dire circumstances.
Kent State legally different than Texas or Virginia Tech
Kent State’s shootings implicated higher levels of legal liability … on both sides of the gun barrels. First, contrary to the clear innocence of the shooters’ victims at U.T. and V.T., an argument could be (and, in fact, was) made for student culpability in the tragedy of the K.S. Commons. Likewise, state officials from the governor of Ohio down to the president’s office at the university shared in the decisions that led to four dead and nine wounded students.
On May 1, 1970, students demonstrated against Nixon’s invasion of Cambodia. On May 2, a mob burned the Army ROTC barracks on campus. The following day, the Ohio Riot Act was read and tear gas fired, before the students abandoned the campus Commons. A day later, the Ohio National Guard fired into the reconstituted campus crowd.
Immediately after the shootings, officials attempted to blame the protesters. On May 15, the Portage County Prosecutor displayed a shotgun, a pistol, machetes, cap pistols, slingshots and BB guns confiscated from dorm rooms. The ACLU labeled the search illegal and its fruits “meager.”
On June 6, the Ohio legislature enacted a campus riot law, which took effect in the fall.

The legal tide seemed to turn on June 10, when the parent of a dead student filed suit in federal court, asking $6 million against the governor and the guard commanders for “intentionally and maliciously disregarding” students’ safety. On June 23, a U.S. Department of Justice report concluded the shootings “were not necessary and not in order.” Wrongful death suits followed from the other three decedents’ families.
Meanwhile, the pendulum took another swing, as a special grand jury indicted students and faculty for riot, assault and incitement. After unsuccessfully fighting the charges all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, a number of these defendants were eventually fined and imprisoned.
All four of the wrongful-death actions were dismissed on the ground of Ohio’s sovereign immunity from suit. But in 1974 the U.S. Supreme Court held in Scheuer v. Rhodes, an action by the family of one victim, that  Governor Rhodes and other individual state actors, including Kent State’s president, could be sued.  State immunity, said the Supremes, is “no shield for a state official confronted by the claim that he had deprived another of a federal right under color of law.” Meanwhile, eight guardsmen were indicted on civil rights charges by a federal grand jury; all were eventually acquitted.
In 1975’s Krause v. Rhodes, which consolidated all four decedents’ wrongful death claims, a federal jury found the defendants not liable by a 9-3 vote, but the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ordered a new trial. As legal wrangling over campus construction that would obliterate the scene of the shootings dragged on, the parties settled for $675,000 in 1979. The four families had sought a grand total of $46 million.
While the settlement amount was relatively small, the cost to Kent State was enormous in terms of legal costs, distraction from the core mission, faculty imprisonment and damage to the school’s reputation.

No comments:

Post a Comment





Thursday, February 19, 2015

When is it cheating and when is it collaboration?



If you too wrestle with this issue, consider signing up for my April webinar on this topic:

Cheating and Plagiarism in the New Age of Texting, Tweeting, Googling and Mash-Ups: Guidance for How to Respond to This Pervasive Higher Education Problem

Best For: Higher Education
Date/Time: 4/23/2015, 1 PM Eastern
Duration: Scheduled for 90 minutes including question and answer session.
Presenter(s): James Ottavio Castagnera, Ph.D. and Attorney at Law
Price: $299.00 webinar, $349.00 CD, $399.00 webinar + CD. Each option may be viewed by an unlimited number of attendees in one room using one unique login. CD includes full audio presentation, question and answer session and presentation slides.
Who Should Attend? Administrators, faculty, staff, higher education counsel
The sub-culture of cheating remains the most pervasive problem confronting institutions of higher learning today. A 2012 survey of 23,000 students revealed that 51% of college students admitted cheating on an exam and/or other assessment one or more times during the preceding academic year. Common methods of cheating included:
  • Downloading papers from the Internet
  • Using a smart phone to browse the web during a test
  • Texting answers back and forth
  • Saving notes on a phone for use during a test
  • Photographing test papers for posting on line
  • Hiring a surrogate to take an online test
  • Cutting and pasting materials from websites
Today’s smart phone savvy students mistakenly believe the “if your smart phone lets you do it, it must be all right.” Such practices threaten the academic integrity on which our education system is based, and represent infractions which colleges and universities are continuously battling to control. A strong defense, however, begins with strong policies and techniques for preventing and detecting plagiarism and cheating, as well as a program for covering due-process requirements for investigating, adjudicating, and sanctioning violations of academic integrity. At the same time effective enforcement must be balanced with risk management and litigation avoidance. Responding to a charge of cheating or plagiarism can be difficult, but getting it wrong can not only impact a student’s rights, but also result in possible lawsuit for the institution. Please join Dr. Jim Castagnera, managing director of K&C HR Enterprises and legal counsel at Rider University. Dr. Castagnera is highly experienced in issues of academic integrity, being the long-time chair of Rider’s Academic Integrity Committee as well as the school’s responsible official for research integrity. He will offer guidance for making sure that your academic integrity policies and practices are up to today’s challenges.

WHAT YOU’LL LEARN


Just a sampling of what this webinar will cover:
  • The most popular methods used by cheaters
  • How to detect and how to prevent violations
  • Best practices and policies in the realm of academic integrity
  • Due process requirements for investigation, adjudication and sanctioning of violations
  • The latest lawsuits involving Academic Integrity issues and how to prevent them at your university
  • AND MUCH MORE!

YOUR CONFERENCE LEADER

Your conference leader for “Cheating and Plagiarism in the New Age of Texting, Tweeting, Googling and Mash-Ups: Guidance for How to Respond to This Pervasive Higher Education Problem” is Dr. James Castagnera. Dr. Castagnera holds a law degree and a Ph.D. in American studies from Case Western Reserve University. Jim brings nearly three decades of experience in higher education to this webinar. Prior to law school he served Case Western Reserve as director of university communication. He went on to teach at the University of Texas-Austin, the Widener University Law School, and the University of Pennsylvania, Wharton Business School. Currently, and for nearly the past 18 years, he has been Rider University’s associate provost and legal counsel. His diverse duties include risk management, regulatory matters, faculty and student disciplinary cases, litigation management, governance and institutional policies.
He is the author of 18 books, including the Handbook for Student Law for Higher Education Administrators (Peter Lang, 2010, revised edition 2014), which is available at Your text to link… and Counter Terrorism Issues (CRC Press 2013).
His teaching experience includes continuing legal education courses, webinars and presentations at numerous national forums, including the Annual Conference of the National Center for the Study of Collective Bargaining in Higher Education and the Annual Homeland Defense and Security Higher Education Summit sponsored by the Naval Postgraduate School.

EducationAdminWebAdvisor.com QUALITY COMMITMENT

EducationAdminWebAdvisor, a division of DKG Media, LP, wants you to be satisfied with your webinar. If this webinar does not meet your expectations, email us atservice@educationadminwebadvisor.com.

CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION